The LeaderDNA Assessment™
The LeaderDNA Assessment™
LeaderDNAThe LeaderDNA Assessment™
Leadership Derailers Assessment™

What could
derail this leader?

A ten-category leadership risk awareness scan. Protect influence before behavior becomes reputation.

Prepared for
Jordan Avery
July 16, 2026
Overall Derailer Risk Index™
147 / 250
Moderate Derailer Risk
Manageable risk with two or three patterns to watch.
How to read this report

Leadership risk awareness, not a verdict

This report names patterns that, under pressure, can quietly limit the influence of otherwise high-performing leaders. It is not a diagnosis, a personality label, or a statement about character. It is a structured awareness tool, built for senior leaders who would rather see a risk early than be told about it after the fact.

What it is
A self-aware look at how behavior can shift under stress, scrutiny, and scale.
How to use it
Pair with a coach or trusted peer. Pick one or two patterns to interrupt. Revisit in 90 days.
What it is not
Not a clinical assessment, not a performance review, not a fixed read on who you are.
Important
Higher scores indicate higher risk for that pattern, not a flaw in the person. Most senior leaders carry two or three elevated patterns; what separates the strongest is the willingness to see them and act early.
01 · Leadership Derailer Overview

What this report names

Jordan Avery, your Overall Derailer Risk Index™ is 147 out of 250, which places you in the Moderate Derailer Risk band. Manageable risk with two or three patterns to watch. The top three patterns to watch are Burnout & Sustainability Risk, Impulsiveness, Emotional Reactivity. The areas already protecting your influence are Low Accountability, Conflict Avoidance, Inconsistency. This report names the specific behaviors most likely to cost you reputation, retention, or trust if unaddressed, and the moves that interrupt them.

Reputation Risk Summary
Jordan Avery, you carry two or three behaviors that are not yet costing you reputation, but they are visible to the people closest to you. The risk is not catastrophic; it is compounding. Addressing the top patterns now is far cheaper than addressing them after they have shaped how senior stakeholders read your leadership.
02 · Overall Derailer Risk Index™

The headline number

147
out of 250 possible
Moderate Derailer Risk
Manageable risk with two or three patterns to watch.
How to read it
50-100 · Low Derailer Risk
101-150 · Moderate Derailer Risk
151-200 · Elevated Derailer Risk
201-250 · High Derailer Risk
Where you land on the risk scale
LowModerateElevatedHigh
2Low Risk
4Moderate Risk
2Elevated Risk
2High Risk
03 · Derailer Category Breakdown

The ten derailer categories

Each category is scored on a 5 to 25 scale. Higher scores indicate greater derailer risk. The dashed line marks the threshold where a category enters elevated risk territory (16+).

Burnout & Sustainability RiskRuns past the redline.
High Risk22/25
ImpulsivenessActs before assessing.
High Risk21/25
Emotional ReactivityMood sets the room.
Elevated Risk20/25
Micromanagement & ControlHolds the wheel too tight.
Elevated Risk17/25
Ego & OverconfidenceBelief outruns input.
Moderate Risk14/25
Poor ListeningTalks past the room.
Moderate Risk13/25
DefensivenessDefends before listening.
Moderate Risk12/25
InconsistencyExpectations drift.
Moderate Risk11/25
Conflict AvoidanceDelays the hard talk.
Low Risk9/25
Low AccountabilityOwns less than required.
Low Risk8/25
03 · Derailer Risk Radar

Risk profile vs strength shield

The crimson polygon shows the risk footprint across all ten categories. The emerald shield shows where you are already protected (the inverse). Your Top 3 risks are emphasized in red around the perimeter; the dashed ring marks the Elevated Risk threshold (16/25).

EGOMICCAVDEFLSTIMPINCEMRLACBRN
Top 3 Risk Categories
  • Burnout & Sustainability Risk22/25
  • Impulsiveness21/25
  • Emotional Reactivity20/25
Strength Anchors
  • Low Accountability8/25
  • Conflict Avoidance9/25
  • Inconsistency11/25
03 · Category Definitions

What each derailer measures

Ego & Overconfidence14/25
Trusts own judgment over the team, becomes frustrated when ideas are questioned, and moves forward when others express concern.
Micromanagement & Control17/25
Stays too closely involved in others' work, struggles to trust capable people, and corrects how rather than what.
Conflict Avoidance9/25
Avoids difficult conversations, lets tension drift, and softens corrective feedback to keep the peace.
Defensiveness12/25
Becomes irritated when decisions are challenged, takes feedback personally, and defends intentions over understanding concerns.
Poor Listening13/25
Interrupts before others finish, forms responses while others speak, and misses information by listening to reply.
Impulsiveness21/25
Decides quickly, commits ahead of capacity, and cleans up consequences later rather than weighing risk up front.
Inconsistency11/25
Priorities shift without explanation, expectations vary by audience, and follow-through trails the energy of the start.
Emotional Reactivity20/25
Frustration spills onto the team, mood colors the tone, and pressure produces sharper or less patient responses.
Low Accountability8/25
Explains away results, is slow to admit being wrong, and holds others to a higher standard than self.
Burnout & Sustainability Risk22/25
Pushes past healthy limits, neglects rest and recovery, and operates from exhaustion rather than clarity.
04 · Top 3 Derailer Risks

The patterns to watch first

  1. 1Burnout & Sustainability Risk: Burnout is a leadership risk, not a personal one. Decisions get sharper, judgment narrows, and the team absorbs your depleted bandwidth as the new normal.
  2. 2Impulsiveness: Impulsive moves create downstream cleanup that drains the team. The pattern reads as energy at first and as chaos a quarter later.
  3. 3Emotional Reactivity: Emotional reactivity is the single most cited reason high performers fail in senior roles. One reactive moment in a 1:1 costs trust that takes months to rebuild.
05 · Low-Risk Strength Areas

What is already protecting influence

  1. 1Low Accountability: You own results when they are difficult, which sets the standard everyone else takes their cue from.
  2. 2Conflict Avoidance: You address hard issues in time, which prevents the slow drag of unresolved tension and models candor for the team.
  3. 3Inconsistency: You hold consistent expectations and follow through, which lets the team execute instead of guessing the new signal.
06 · Pressure Pattern Analysis

How behavior shifts when load increases

Under pressure, the patterns most likely to surface in your profile are Burnout & Sustainability Risk, Impulsiveness, Emotional Reactivity. These are the behaviors that strengthen, not soften, when load increases. Tracking the moment they appear, naming them in real time, and building a single replacement behavior is the most reliable way to interrupt the pattern before it lands in a meeting where the cost is high.

07 · Team Impact Analysis

How the team experiences this leader

On the team, your top patterns most often show up as reduced candor, slower decisions, and the quiet hedging that happens when people are uncertain how you will respond. People rarely tell their leader what these behaviors cost; they simply route around them. The work is to make the change visible enough that the team updates its read on you.

08 · Reputation Risk Summary

What is on the line if unaddressed

Jordan Avery, you carry two or three behaviors that are not yet costing you reputation, but they are visible to the people closest to you. The risk is not catastrophic; it is compounding. Addressing the top patterns now is far cheaper than addressing them after they have shaped how senior stakeholders read your leadership.
09 · Coaching Recommendations

The highest-leverage coaching focuses

  • Burnout & Sustainability Risk: Coach toward sustainable cadence. Two non-negotiable recovery rhythms per week, calendar-blocked, with one accountability partner.
  • Impulsiveness: Coach toward the pre-mortem. Before any major commitment, name the three ways it could fail and what you would do if each happened.
  • Emotional Reactivity: Coach toward composure rituals. Pre-meeting reset, between-meeting decompression, and a debrief habit after any heated exchange.
10 · 30-Day Behavior Reset Plan

Interrupt the top patterns

Days 1-10
Interrupt Burnout & Sustainability Risk
Progress · 0 / 3
0%
Days 11-20
Replace Impulsiveness
Progress · 0 / 3
0%
Days 21-30
Stabilize on Emotional Reactivity
Progress · 0 / 3
0%
Check items off as you work. Progress saves on this device only.
11 · 90-Day Leadership Sustainability Plan

Lock in the change

Days 1-30
Build the new Burnout & Sustainability Risk cadence
Progress · 0 / 2
0%
Days 31-60
Compound with Impulsiveness
Progress · 0 / 2
0%
Days 61-90
Lock in sustainability with Emotional Reactivity
Progress · 0 / 2
0%
Check items off as you work. Progress saves on this device only.
12 · Closing Note

Protect what you have built

Derailers are not a verdict on character. They are the behaviors that strong leaders manage out of their pattern before those behaviors define their reputation. Treat this report as a working plan to protect what you have already built.

A note on how to use this report

This is a self-reported leadership risk awareness scan, not a clinical diagnosis or a verdict on character. It surfaces patterns that, under pressure, can quietly limit influence for high-performing leaders. Use it with a coach or trusted peer to choose where to focus, then revisit in 90 days to see what shifted.